Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> SECLaw.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: SECLaw.comSupreme Court Rejects Scheme Liability in Stoneridge
By Mark H. Astarita, Esq.
Full post as published by SECLaw.com on January 16, 2008 (boomark / email).
Stoneridge in Action
Stoneridge in Action Now that the Supreme Court has weighed in against the notion of "scheme" liability in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., 128 S.Ct...
Supreme Court Decides Stoneridge:
Today the U.S. Supreme Court decided Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta. By a vote of 5-3, the Court rejected "scheme liability" and held that private rights of action under Section...
Stoneridge
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its long awaited decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., 552 U.S. __ (2008). The decision affirms the Supreme Court’s tendency to limit implied rights of action under the securities laws...
Supreme Court Protects Third Party Advisers in Stoneridge
Today, by a 5-3 vote, the Supreme Court decided Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta, rejecting the concept of "scheme liability" that would have allowed shareholders to sue third party advisers who may have facilitated the fraudulent transactions...
Supreme Court Rules Against Scheme Liability in Stoneridge
The U.S. Supreme Court decided Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta today, holding (5-3) that the plaintiff in a private securities fraud class action could not sue third parties who allegedly engaged in deceptive acts to further the corporation's securities fraud,...
Atkins on Stoneridge
SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins adds his voice in the WSJ to the large chorus of sensible people objecting to civil scheme liability:In Stoneridge,the Supreme Court held that investors in one company cannot sue other companies for securities fraud unless those...
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Hershey Co. et al.
allegedly involved in a chocolate price fixing scheme.
Wesley A. Snyder et al.
alleging the consultants perpetrated a Ponzi scheme by encouraging borrowers to lend more than they needed.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.








