Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklySixth Circuit grant on use of experts in the guilt phase
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
A panel of the Sixth Circuit in Abdul Awkal v. Mitchell, No. 01-4278, Monday granted relief. From that opinion:
At trial, Awkal?s sole defense to the murder charges that he faced was that he was not guilty by reason of insanity. During the guilt phase of trial, Awkal?s counsel attempted to present the testimony of three expert witnesses to support this defense: Dr. Paul E. Hewitt (?Hewitt?), Dr. Magdi S. Rizk (?Rizk?), and Dr. Eileen S. McGee (?McGee?). Hewitt testified first, but shortly after he began testifying, the trial court determined that Hewitt was not a licensed psychologist. The trial court determined that because Hewitt was not a licensed psychologist, he was not qualified to offer an opinion regarding the sole guilt-phase issue?Awkal?s sanity at the time of the crime...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on March 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Job Site Fatalities Increase
Safety Experts Concerned
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Sixth Circuit penalty phase relief grant
Sixth Circuit Holds that Failure to Accommodate Can Be Constructive Discharge
On the case in the Sixth Circuit








