Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime & Federalism
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime & FederalismScience and the Law
ADVERTISEMENTS
For the first time in several years, I spent a week not reading anything law. No cases, no work, no books. Nothing. If you think you see a lot wrong with the system when reading law, put the books down and read some science: Then you'll really realize how screwy the system is.
Let's take eyewitness identifications, for example. Let's see how they're done, and see why a freshman wouldn't pass Chemistry 101 if he performed his science the way we perform eyewitness IDs.
In the typical police line-up, police put a suspect's photograph on
a sheet with five other people with similar characteristics. It's
called a "six pack," since there are six photos on the page. The
police then tell an eyewitness to "Pick one...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime & Federalism on July 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Access to Science Information Expands with Science.gov 5.0 Launch
Science 2.0 - Commentary on Open Access Science Practices
Similar on Science: Obama and McCain
The science of search: time for a librarian role in e-discovery
Bush Science: Bush Administration Seeks to Limit Role of the Scientists on Environmental Science








