Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentIL: Franks challenge actually succeeds on alibi
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Defendant's alibi affidavits from himself and two witnesses that he was not home and could not have sold drugs to the CI was sufficient to require a Franks hearing and the evidence at the hearing supported the trial court's suppression order under Franks. People v. Caro, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 294 (1st Dist. April 3, 2008):
Similarly, in the present case, defendant filed an affidavit stating that he was at work on the day the informant stated he made the purchase and that when he came home he ate dinner and watched television and went to bed. He denied selling or using any illegal drugs on the day in question. Defendant's two roommates also filed affidavits in support, stating that when defendant arrived home from work no one other than he and his roommates were present...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on April 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Illinois County Sign Ordinance Challenged
Story of Schundler campaign in New Jersey
Hoekstra: Pelosis Vacation Alibi
Delay and Conquer: White House Succeeds in Running Out the Clock on Meirs and Bolten Subpoenas
Another Day, Another Ruling on Preserving Issues for Appeal







