Constitutional Law

Transcript of online chat yesterday

It's online here. Thanks to those who wandered in!

[UPDATE: the key is that the dissenters claim you only have a right to arms if you are in a WELL-REGULATED, with inference by the goverment, militia, which (they don't add) (a) conveniently doesn't exist and (b) certainly wouldn't be created by any jurisdiction that wanted to enact arms restrictions. They don't deal with the question of how much "regulation," recognizing the special meaning of that term, makes a force well-regulated, or whether a court is suited to make that judgment.]

Full post as published by Of Arms and the Law on June 28, 2008 (boomark / email).