Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Burden of Proof on CAFA Removals!!
Abrego, Lowedermilk, and others have been reversed!! Plaintiffs now bear the burden of establishing the nonexistence of minimal-diversity jurisdiction under CAFA. Finally, someone bothered to read and understand Section 2 of Congress' "Findings and Purposes" for CAFA and realized that Congress intended to extend federal jurisdiction over interstate class actions. As a result, defendants can now remove class actions with minimal diversity and the plaintiff has the burden of proving that minimal diversity is not satisfied.
This decision is so hot, we wanted to bring it to you TODAY before anyone else had a chance to report it to you. Since it is so fresh TODAY, we have not had a chance to digest it completely for you. Consequently, until we can draft a formal post on TODAY's decision, please click here for more information.
Full post as published by CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on April 01, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
LA Weight Loss
Recalls LA Hot Drinks Café Au Lait
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.

An Added Burden For Speakers In Copyright Law
GA: Supreme Court reverses pds contempt conviction
New York Court to Decide Defendant's Burden of Proof for Summary Judgment on "Defect" Question
Superficial analysis of CT Supreme Court decisions








