Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerOral argument preview: Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
This afternoon at 2:00 p.m. in San Francisco, an eleven-judge en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument on rehearing in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc. (see this blog post for more). In 2007, a three-judge panel (with one judge dissenting) affirmed the trial court's order granting class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) of plaintiffs' Title VII claims for gender discrimination. Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 509 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 2007).
Time permitting, I'm going to attend the Ninth Circuit argument today and provide a report here tomorrow.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on March 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
Generic Versions
Barr Pharmaceuticals to pay $5.9 million settlement for blocking the sale of oral contraceptives.
Oral Sodium Phosphate
or OSP has allegedly been recalled for acute kidney injury and kidney failure.
DVD Players Recalled by Wal-Mart Due to Fire Hazard
DVD Players Recalled by Wal-Mart Due to Fire Hazard
Wal-Mart
Must Pay $6.5 Million to Employees

En Banc Rehearing in Dukes v. Wal-Mart
Ice oral argument transcript now available
SCOTUSwiki Preview: Kansas v. Colorado
SCOTUSwiki Preview: Wyeth v. Levine







