Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Alabama Appellate Watch
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Alabama Appellate WatchLack of Standing Requires Dismissal of Appeal
In Marshall v. Cook, Ms. 2070184 (Ala. Civ. App. July 18, 2008), the Court of Civil Appeals sua sponte dismissed an appeal when it determined that the appellant lacked standing.
In Marshall, a father filed suit seeking an accounting for a conservatorship established for his son. During the pendency of the proceeding, the son reached the age of majority, and reached a settlement agreement with the conservators, even though there were funds still not accounted for. The circut court approved the consent settlement, and the father appealed the order affirming the consent settlement. Reviewing the issue of jurisdiction and standing sua sponte, the Court of Civil Appeals dismissed the appeal. The court found that the father had no interest in the outcome of the accounting or of any reimbursement to the estate. Further, the father stated claims in his own name and not on behalf of his son. Because the father had no standing, he could not appeal the entry of the consent settlement, and the appeal was dismissed.
Full post as published by Alabama Appellate Watch on July 23, 2008 (boomark / email).
FAA
Signficant Lack of Oversight in Airline Maintenance
State Farm Undercompensation
alleging compensation for totaled vehicles is less than California law requires.
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict

COA Dismisses Appeal For Rule Violations
Dismissal of $10 Million Lawsuit Upheld on Appeal
CA1: lessees lack standing to sue manufacturers
Law Primer: Due Process Rights in Relation to Academic Probation and Dismissal
S.C.C. Upholds Dismissal of “Fly in Bottle” Case, Saying Law of Negligence Is Not Insurance









