ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

Are the Pay Caps a Joke?

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

Yes, says Joe Weisenthal, along with some experts.  I'm not so sure, though Vic's possible workarounds suggest that, as with taxes, it's more possible to avoid putatively tough, but possibly only symbolic, government rules than you'd think.  First, the good news for senior executives: it's not a retroactive freeze, restricted stock options aren't covered by the cap, and most bailed out firms can avoid caps by getting shareholder approval to do so.

However, the "guidelines" we've seen so far (and maybe Treasury has a more formal document out there, but it's not up on the web yet) provide:

Limit Senior Executives to $500,000 in Total Annual Compensation Plus Restricted Stock ? Unless Waived with Full Public Disclosure and Shareholder Vote: Companies that participate in generally available capital access programs may waive the $500,000 plus restricted stock rule only by disclosure of their compensation and, if requested, a non-binding "say on pay" shareholder resolution.

Some people think that the term "senior executive" only applies to the CEO and not star traders.  But I'm not so sure.  The question is whether star traders, many of whom carry the job title "vice president," or "head of global derivatives," are "executives" or not.  "Senior executive" is defined by the statute by compensation, not position:

the term ??senior executive officer?? means an individual who is one of the top 5 highly paid executives of a public company.

So I'm not sure that these guidelines might not have at least a little bite, at least with regard to the second $350 billion of TARP money, in that they'll require embarassing say on pay procedures ... or one of Vic's workarounds.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on February 05, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 10/31/26 22:19:48)