ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Manta on Criminal Sanctions for Violations of Intellectual Property Law

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS
Irina D. Manta (Case Western Reserve University School of Law) has posted The Puzzle of Criminal Sanctions for Intellectual Property Infringement (Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 24, 2011) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
    Civil sanctions are available for infringements against all types of intellectual property (IP) goods, including those covered by copyright, trademark, and patent protections. Nonetheless, the criminal law only provides sanctions for violating some forms of IP, such as copyright and trademarks, but fails to do so for infringing patents. In an attempt to solve that puzzle, this Article argues that the disparity arose for sensible moral and utilitarian reasons, yet also from political splits in the patent industry. The analysis first delineates how governments and courts have justified as legitimate the criminalization of IP infringement in the first place, which has often involved drawing parallels to property law violations. The Article further traces the rationales behind existing criminal sanctions in IP and explains how international developments may affect criminal IP laws in the United States. It then tests several theories for the disparity in the availability of criminal sanctions, including explanations from the realms of morality, utilitarianism, and public choice. This Article identifies as important factors the differences between the types of infringing acts in copyright and trademarks versus patents, the effect of modern technologies on infringement in each IP regime, and greater concerns about overdeterrence in the patent context. It also, however, points to the key role that lobbying by major actors has played and continues to play in maintaining the status quo, and it shows how shifts in the relative lobbying expenditures of different industries could affect the status of patent criminal sanctions. Finally, the Article draws on this framework to question the existence of criminal sanctions for non-commercial copyright infringement.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on September 16, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 16:38:44)