Academic

Crawford on Tax Lessons of the Astor Trial

By Lawrence Solum

Bridget J. Crawford (Pace University School of Law) has posted Tax Lessons from the Astor Trial (Tax Notes, Vol. 166, No. 9, 2009) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

This article examines the changes that philanthropist Brooke Russell Astor made to her will ? or, more accurately, the changes that Mrs. Astor purportedly made to her will ? before her death in 2007. Anthony Marshall, the 85-year old son of Brooke Astor, and lawyer Francis X. Morrissey, who supervised the execution of a third codicil to her will, presently stand accused of more than 20 criminal counts including fraud and conspiracy. Ultimately a jury will decide whether the defendants duped and sole from Mrs. Astor. In the meantime, however, the prosecution and the press have presented as ?evidence? of alleged wrongdoing nothing more than evidence that Mrs. Astor's lawyers recommended standard tax planning techniques. Those who seek an analysis of the particular criminal charges should look elsewhere. Fishers for gossipy commentary on the professional conduct of the lawyers who have testified in Astor case will be disappointed. Tax gurus, read on for a discussion of charitable remainder trusts, income in respect of a decedent, multi-generational philanthropy, fiduciary powers and estate tax deductions under IRC § 2053.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on September 02, 2009 (boomark / email).