Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> The Confrontation Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: The Confrontation BlogClerk reversed
By Richard D. Friedman
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Supreme Court decided Ohio v. Clark today. You can see the opinions here. The result is a 9-0 reversal in favor of the State. No particular surprise there. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Ginsburg, wrote separately, concurring only in the judgment, and Justice Thomas did the same. The majority opinion indicates that statements to private persons or by young children will rarely be testimonial for Confrontation clause purposes, but it does not make a categorical holding on either point. Justice Scalia objects to some of what he regards as anti-Crawford dicta in the majority opinion. More later, probably this evening.Full post as published by The Confrontation Blog on June 18, 2015 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Wal-Mart
Avoids Criminal Charges over Clerk's Death
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.








