Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogCimino on Aretaic Contract Theory
By Lawrence Solum
-
For years, legal theory scholars have been obsessed with two dominant normative accounts: law and economics and individual rights. Recently, however, an old normative theory has resurfaced. Virtue theory, grounded in Aristotelian practical philosophy, has begun to receive attention from both historians and legal philosophers. In the past year, a small group of theorists has made a dramatic move: they have attempted to apply virtue theory to problems in contemporary law, in the form of a new ?virtue jurisprudence.? Thus far, virtue jurisprudence scholars have limited their work to public law subjects. This article makes a substantial new contribution by extending virtue jurisprudence to a central area of private law: contracts.
Why contract law? This article contends that several difficult challenges in contract jurisprudence remain unresolved because neither law and economics nor rights theorists have been successful in accounting for the actual desires of contracting parties. For example, current theoretical frameworks fail to fully explain contract?s duality as both an economic and social institution. They fail to account for parties? interest in both wealth maximization and justice. Virtue jurisprudence accounts for these critical dualities better than either law and economics or individual rights. Accordingly, this article suggests that virtue jurisprudence may reframe how both theorists and courts think about ?the parties? intent,? which is a foundational concept in any contract case.
This article takes on several tasks. It explains virtue theory in ways that show its relevance to contract law. It lays out a historical case for the importance of virtue theory to political liberalism and free markets. It explores several sites where current theoretical approaches do not fully capture contracting parties? intent. Finally, it shows how virtue jurisprudence may offer a superior descriptive, and normative, account of intent-based doctrines in contract law.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on March 15, 2010 (boomark / email).
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Expedia
$184 Million Breach of Contract Settlement Reached
Joint Venture
Gallaher Group agrees to pay Reynolds American $387 million contract dispute settlement.
Consulting Contract
Racine Unified School District agrees to pay Public Business Consulting Group a $750,000 settlement.

Over at our sister ship . . . .
Nussbaum and Social Contract Theory
The "Goat Hacking" Justification for Contract Law
Court of Chancery Explains Contract Interpretation Rules








