ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogBrettschneider on the Rule of Law
By Lawrence Solum
ADVERTISEMENTS
Corey L. Brettschneider (Brown University - Department of Political Science; Princeton University - Center for Human Values) has posted A Substantive Conception of the Rule of Law: Non-Arbitrary Treatment and the Limits of Procedure (Nomos 54: Getting to the Rule of Law (NYU Press, 2011)) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:-
In his contribution to this volume of Nomos, Jeremy Waldron develops a conception of the rule of law that emphasizes the centrality of procedural guarantees in the courtroom, such as rights to an attorney, to an impartial judge, and to a fair trial. Procedural guarantees should be respected, writes Waldron, because they protect the dignity of individuals as ?active intelligences.? In my contribution to the same Nomos volume, I draw on Waldron?s powerful case for the importance of procedures to develop an argument for a more substantive understanding of the rule of law. Specifically, I emphasize two ways that Waldron?s argument might be expanded. I argue first that Waldron?s appeal to dignity as the moral basis of procedures commits him to an account of substantive guarantees. These guarantees may limit, at times, the procedural dimensions of both law and democratic decision-making. Second, I expand on Waldron?s notion of dignity?itself a substantive value?as respect for ?active intelligence.? In particular, I argue that those subject to law are entitled to non-arbitrary treatment. When dignity is theorized in this way, we can better understand the relationship between the substantive values at the heart of the rule of law and their substantive implications. This expanded conception of dignity more clearly distinguishes between the concept of the rule of law and the ideal of democratic self-rule. I also specify ways in which our approaches to theorizing the rule of law parallel our competing theories of democracy.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on September 28, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Rule Of China Law And GDP. Was It The Chicken Or The Egg
A Rule Versus the Right Rule Bleg:
HEADS UP: E-VERIFY RULE LIKELY WILL BE OUT IN NEXT FEW WEEKS
The Silliest Legal Ethics Rule








