ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Arbitration & Mediation Blogs -> Settle It Now Negotiation Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Arbitration & Mediation

: Settle It Now Negotiation Blog

An Open Letter to ACCA SoCal on Bringing George W. Bush to its Annual Gala

By Victoria Pynchon

ADVERTISEMENTS

Association of Corporate Counsel of Southern California

February 19, 2011

Dear ACCA Board,

I am writing to express my deepest concern that you have invited George W. Bush to speak at this year's gala. I am a life-long member of the ACLU and support the right of all people to speak their minds. ACCA's yearly gala is, however, a curated event in which only the most prestigious and influential voices are invited to be heard. My attorney husband and I have, for instance, heard Al Gore, Tony Blair, Condoleezza Rice, and Colin Powell speak and have been happy to listen even though we support some but not all of the views expressed by those individuals. 

George Bush - a man who waged an unrelenting campaign against the Rule of Law in America and authorized the torture of detainees at Guantanamo and "dark sites" in foreign countries through extraordinary rendition - should not be invited to speak to an organization whose highest value is the survival, indeed the thriving vitality, of the Rule of Law in America.

I would greatly appreciate a response to this open letter explaining why the ACCA Board has chosen to bring George W. Bush to speak to an assembly of some of the most powerful and respected attorneys in Southern California.

Let me alert you to the fact that Mr. Bush was recently forced to cancel a speaking engagement in Switzerland to avoid prosecution for war crimes. Support for the investigation was explained at CNN's website by Michael Ratner, President of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York. Excerpt below.

The support for the investigation stems from Bush's open admission that the authorized water boarding, the necessity people feel to hold torturers accountable if we are to end torture, and the utter failure of the United States to investigate Bush and others. The U.S., as the most powerful country in the world, is an example to the world: If the U.S. can openly torture, so can every other country.

There have been some naysayers to the attempts to internationally prosecute Bush and other officials. They have it wrong. They want a world in which if a country does not investigate its own torturers, then no other country should. They argue, as David Frum did in a recent column on this site, that efforts by the Center for Constitutional Rights and its partner legal organizations to seek criminal accountability of former President Bush in Switzerland amount to "law as a weapon of politics" and "assault upon the basic norms of American constitutional democracy."

Let's correct one major misconception some have about the basis for this action and how it relates to the U.S. legal system at the outset. The Convention Against Torture, which mandates that Switzerland and 146 other countries including the United States investigate and prosecute torturers, is part of U.S. law. Its ratification and its enforcement is part of our constitutional democracy.

The anti-American and anti-Constitutional acts were Bush's decision to authorize torture and the U.S. failure to hold him accountable. Politics are being used as a weapon against the law by claims that these are policy choices. They are not. As the State Department Legal Advisor Harold Koh stated, torture can never be a "policy choice." Likewise, the investigation and prosecution of our homegrown torturers is a legal obligation and should not be driven by politics.

Please let me hear from you. I and others with whom I have spoken are seriously considering gathering together like-minded attorneys who will work to reverse this unfortunate decision or to organize its boycott.

Sincerely,

American Arbitration Association
(as recently featured on NPR's All Things Considered)
ForbesWoman's She Negotiates Blog
Member, Panel of Distinguished Neutrals,
(please note that the only organization on whose behalf I am authorized to speak is She Negotiates Consulting and Training - I am simply on the panels of the listed ADR associations and am simply one of many bloggers at ForbesWoman)

Full post as published by Settle It Now Negotiation Blog on February 19, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0209 secs (new cache)