Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsUSPTO Promulgates Guidelines for Applying 35 U.S.C. § 112, 2nd Paragraph
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Kevin E. Noonan -- Last Wednesday, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office promulgated "Supplementary Examination Guidelines for Determining Compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112 and for Treatment of Related Issues" (76 Fed. Reg. 7162). The Guidelines, which take effect immediately and apply to all pending applications, "are intended to assist United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) personnel in the examination of claims in patent applications for compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph" as well as assist Office personnel in examining claims containing "functional language" ("means plus function" claims under 35 U.S.C. 112, 6th para.), "especially computer-implemented invention claims,"...Full post as published by Patent Docs on February 16, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

USPTO Guidelines for Determining Obviousness
USPTO issues new section 101 guidelines for use until Supreme Court decides Bilski v. Doll
USPTO Seeks Technological Achievement Award Nominees
Updated KSR Examination Guidelines
Importance of documenting your residency background when applying for citizenship.
Interim Guidelines on Examining Statutory Subject Matter








