ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Business and Technology Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Business and Technology Law

Unauthorized Employee Use of Company Information Under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

By Stephanie Robinson

ADVERTISEMENTS
In 1986, Congress passed the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, or CFAA, which established criminal liabilities for unauthorized access to information stored on a protected computer. Since that time, the CFAA has been amended to keep up with new privacy concerns and, in some cases, civil liability has been attached. The typical CFAA claim is asserted by a party against an unrelated entity accused of stealing computer files for personal gain. However, in cases where a company is seeking to prosecute one of its own employees for accessing protected files, the meaning of the phrase ?without authorization,? an element of any CFAA claim, is hotly contested. In a December 27, 2010, decision by the Eleventh Circuit, the court upheld the conviction of an employee for accessing certain social security information for improper purposes, even though the employee was authorized to access that social security information. The court said that policies defining both the types of information that an employee may access along with the purpose for which the employee may use that information are both relevant under the CFAA ?without authorization? inquiry. In contrast, the Ninth Circuit ruled in 2009 that an employee who was given access to files, without such access being accompanied by a specific ?permitted use? requirement, could not be considered in violation of the CFAA regardless of the use of the information?even if the use was clearly non-business-related. The decisions by these two and other Circuit courts are indicative of a split in authority when interpreting ?without authorization.? However, the lessons for businesses should not be subject to debate. Businesses need to implement thoroughly considered and well-crafted Acceptable Use Policies addressing, among other things, the specific types of information that employees may access along with descriptions of how such information may be used by those employees. It is best practice to review and amend these documents on an annual basis, as changes to company structure or employee access frequently change....

Full post as published by Business and Technology Law on February 07, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0266 secs (new cache)