Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> New Jersey Estate & Elder Planning Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Taxation & Estate Planning
: New Jersey Estate & Elder Planning BlogCourt Can't Create a Special Needs Trust Where There Wasn't a Will
By Deirdre Wheatley-Liss
While courts have the power to interpret a person's intent in a Will to create a Special Needs Trust for a disabled beneficiary, even when the Will does not specifically create such trust, the courts can't create a Special Need Trust out of thin air if the person didn't have a Will. Stacey C. Maiden, Esq., of our Trusts, Estates and Elder Law Department, shares this recently crafted holding from the case of IMO Estate of Margaret A. Flood.
The New Jersey Appellate Court recently considered the unique question as to whether a court could establish a Special Needs Trust in an intestate estate. In this case, the decedent was survived by 4 children. Two of the children were disabled and beneficiaries of supplemental security income (SSI) and Medicaid programs. One of the children received special residential services and other benefits from the division of developmental disability (DDD). The decedent died without a Will, which under the New Jersey intestacy statute distributes her property equally among her four children.
The decedent did consider estate planning in 2004 and according to the certification of her daughter-in-law, she was concerned about protecting the inheritance of her disabled daughters from any obligations to reimburse the governmental entities that provided benefits and services. The decedent did not consult an attorney until March and April of 2008, and she died on May 24, 2008 having never executed a Will or a testamentary trust.
The lower court permitted the establishment and funding of supplemental benefit trusts for the decedents two disable daughters by applying to doctrine at probable intent. The Appellate Court reversed stating that in the absence of a testamentary disposition, the decedent's estate passed by way of the law of intestesty, and her children's interests vested immediately upon her death (N. J.S.A. 3B:1-3.)
The Appellate Court stated that the doctrine of probable intent has no application in the absence of a Will. The Court found that the doctrine of probable intent has never been applied to create a testamentary disposition when the decedent failed to execute a Will. 'In essence the doctrine of probable of intent is rule of construction or interpretation and therefore, presupposes an existing testamentary disposition.' The court concluded that the existing case law precludes application of the doctrine of probable intent to create a testamentary disposition where none existed.
The moral here? You need to be responsible for how your assets are passing to disables beneficiaries in the event of your death by creating a Will that take their disability into account. For further information, see an in-depth analysis of the case by my colleague told in a rally in his posting Doctrine of Probable Intent Cannot Be Used to Create Special Needs Trusts for Intestate Decedent.
Full post as published by New Jersey Estate & Elder Planning Blog on February 07, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Mars Petcare
Issues Recall of Special Kitty Gourmet in 15 States
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
Sea Star Agrees $18.5M Settlement in Anti-trust Class Action
Atlas Cold Storage
Income Trust to pay $40 million to settle a class action that claims misrepresented financial statements.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Securities Settlement
GMH Trust Securities to pay $8.75 million in pending class action suit.

Judicial Creation of Special Needs Trusts Clarified
Structured Settlements ARE NOT owned by Special Needs Trusts
How to Use a Special Needs Trust
Atlanta Special Needs Attorney Answers, What is a Special Needs Trust
Benefits of An Inter-Vivos Stand Alone Third-Party Created and Funded Special Needs Trust.
Parents Of Disabled Child Removed As Trustees of Childs Special Needs Trust After Commingling Funds








