Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Representing Investors
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Representing InvestorsMerrill Lynch Settles SEC Fraud Charges
By Keith Griffin
On Jan. 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Merrill Lynch with civil securities fraud for ?misusing customer order information? to place proprietary trades and for charging customers undisclosed trading fees.
Without admitting or denying the charges, Merrill has agreed to pay a $10 million fine and consent to a cease-and-desist order.
According to the SEC, the infractions occurred between 2003 and 2005 on Merrill Lynch?s proprietary equity strategy desk, which traded for the firm?s benefit and had nothing to do with executing customer orders. Merrill?s trading desk was located on its main equity trading floor in New York, where market makers received and executed customer orders.
The SEC says Merrill?s equity strategy traders had access to institutional customer orders and used that access to place trades on Merrill?s behalf after the customer trades were made. The SEC went on to say that this misuse of information was contrary to claims by Merrill Lynch to customers that orders would be maintained on a strict need-to-know basis.
?Investors have the right to expect that their brokers won’t misuse their order information,? said Scott W. Friestad, Associate Director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. ?The conduct here was clearly inappropriate. Merrill?s proprietary traders had improper access to information about the firm?s customer orders, and misused it to place trades on the firm’s behalf.?
The SEC?s order also found that between 2002 and 2007 Merrill had agreements with certain institutional and high net-worth customers that Merrill would only charge a commission equivalent for executing riskless principal trades. However, in some instances, Merrill also charged customers undisclosed mark-ups and mark-downs by filling customer orders at prices less favorable to the customer than the prices at which Merrill purchased or sold the securities in the market.
Bank of America acquired Merrill Lynch in 2009 in a $20 billion deal forged with the help of government bailout dollars during the height of the financial crisis in 2008.
Full post as published by Representing Investors on January 26, 2011 (boomark / email).
How to Skirt H-1B Regulations
Senator reacts to YouTube video
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees
How to recover billing errors
H&R Block Retirement Plan Fraud
How to Join Class Action Suit
Bank of America Settles Merrill Lynch Class Action for $150 Million
Bank of America Settles Merrill Lynch Class Action for $150 Million
Bank of America, Merrill Lynch
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Bank of America, Merrill Lynch
BAC
Merrill Lynch and Bank of America
CEOs Sued in Class Action
Merrill Lynch
Agrees a $475 Million Settlement with Ohio Teachers
$100 Million in Dell Fraud Charges Settlement
Dell Settles Fraud Charges for $100 Million

Merrill Lynch Settles "Squawk Box" Violations
NY comptroller settles Merrill Lynch fraud suit
Former Merrill Lynch Banker Settles SEC Charges Relating to Enron's Nigerian Barge Transactions
Merrill Lynch Acquisition Investigation
BAC Settles with SEC Over Merrill Bonuses








