Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawFruits of an undercover investigation used as a basis for disciplinary charges
DiGiovanni v Safir277 AD2d 36
May the appointing authority bring disciplinary action against an employee based on information obtained from undercover police officers. As the DiGiovanni decision indicates, such information can serve as a basis for filing disciplinary charges against an individual.
In this instance an undercover police officer and her supervisor testified that George DiGiovanni approached a police decoy and proposed oral sex for a fee.
DiGiovanni, as it turned out, was a New York City police officer. As a result of this episode, he was served with administrative disciplinary charges. The hearing officer found him guilty of soliciting sex and imposed the penalty of dismissal. DiGiovanni appealed only to have the Appellate Division unanimously affirm both the administrative determination that he was guilty of the charges filed against him and penalty imposed.
The Appellate Division decided that the evidence presented at the disciplinary hearing supported the finding that DiGiovanni was guilty of soliciting sex for money from a person believed by him to be a prostitute.
Turning to DiGiovanni?s objection to his being dismissed from his position, the court said that "[g]iven the gravity of the offense and [DiGiovanni?s] prior disciplinary history, the penalty imposed does not shock our conscience."
The court?s reference to DiGiovanni?s prior disciplinary history suggests that the department asked the hearing officer to consider DiGiovanni?s personnel history in determining the penalty to be imposed.
An employee?s personnel records may be considered by a hearing officer when the setting a disciplinary penalty provided the appointing authority has complied with the procedures set out by the Court of Appeals in Bigelow v Village of Gouverneur, 63 NY2d 470. The procedures to be followed in order to satisfy the Bigelow test:
1. The employee must be advised that his or her prior disciplinary record will be considered in setting the penalty to be imposed; and
2. The employee must be given an opportunity to submit a written response to any adverse material contained in the record or offer mitigating circumstances.
NYPPL
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on December 07, 2010 (boomark / email).
Private Investigators and Detectives
Services Provided by Private Investigators
Verizon To Pay $52 Million To Settle
Verizon To Pay $52 Million To Settle "Pay as You Go" Data Charges FCC Investigation
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
AT&T International Roaming Charges, AT&T lawsuit
AT&T Faces International Roaming Charges Lawsuit
McAfee, Symantec
Settle Investigation into Automatic Antivirus Subscription Practices
Schering Plough, Merck
Settle Multi-State Investigation for $5.4 Million
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Settlement
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Class Action Settlement

No Violations In Billard Parlor Investment
Practice Tip: Good Behavior Advisable During Disciplinary Hearing








