Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Drug Injury Watch
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Drug Injury WatchSanofi-Aventis "Dear Doctor" Letter Will Warn Heart Drug Multaq Associated With Liver Failure
By Tom Lamb
Liver Toxicity And Cardiac Side Effects Cause Dr. Steven Nissen To Express "concerns about the safety, efficacy and tolerability of dronedarone"
(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)
On January 13, 2011 reporter Larry Husten posted on Cardiobrief.org this article, "Sanofi-Aventis To Inform Doctors About Liver Transplants in 2 Patients Taking Multaq (Dronedarone)", which broke the news that Sanofi-Aventis' atrial fibrillation heart drug Multaq has been associated with liver failure and hepatic necrosis:
Sanofi-Aventis is about to send a ?Dear Doctor? letter to physicians informing them of two cases of fulminant hepatic failure/necrosis resulting in liver transplanation in two patients taking Multaq (dronedarone), CardioBrief has learned. The two patients were women in their 70?s with no other apparent causes of liver injury or known elevations of liver function tests (LFTs) prior to the acute liver failure. Liver failure developed after the women were taking dronedarone for four to six months.
On January 14, 2011 the FDA issued "Drug Information Update - Safety Communication: Severe liver injury associated with the use of dronedarone (marketed as Multaq)" which included these details from the Data Summary section:
FDA has received several case reports of hepatocellular liver injury and hepatic failure in patients treated with dronedarone, including two post-marketing reports of acute hepatic failure requiring transplantation. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a treatment population of unknown size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.
The two cases of acute hepatic failure requiring transplantation occurred at 4.5 and 6 months after initiation of dronedarone in patients with previously normal hepatic serum enzymes. Both patients were female and approximately 70 years of age.... In both cases, the explanted liver showed evidence of extensive hepatocellular necrosis.
That same day, January 14, Larry Husten posted this Cardiobrief.org article, "FDA Warns About Severe Liver Injury Associated with Multaq (Dronedarone)", which included the impressions of Dr. Steven Nissen, a leading cardiologist:
Steve Nissen provided the following comment to CardioExchange about Multaq:
I have significant concerns about the safety, efficacy and tolerability of dronedarone. Although liver toxicity was not anticipated, other safety issues have been apparent even prior to launch. The increased risk of death in heart failure patients represented a particularly concerning finding in pre-approval studies. The drug is substantially less efficacious compared with amiodarone and the GI tolerability is poor. Despite these warning signs, the drug has been aggressively promoted, often through industry-sponsored CME offered by professional medical societies. Over-promotion of a risky drug during its initial launch period has been a historically important harbinger of serious safety concerns. Dronedarone may be headed for trouble.
As for the heart problems alluded to by Dr. Nissen, earlier in 2010 the FDA had listed "Dronedarone hydrochloride (Multaq)" twice for possible heart-related side effects:
- "Potential Signals of Serious Risks/New Safety Information Identified by the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) between January ? March 2010" -- for congestive heart failure (CHF); and,
- "Potential Signals of Serious Risks/New Safety Information Identified from the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) between April - June 2010" -- for Torsade de Pointes.
Moving across the Atlantic to Europe, according to a January 14, 2011 article, "FDA alert: Dronedarone and severe liver injury", published online by heartwire:
EMA spokesperson Monika Benstetter told heartwire that the EMA has received the data on the liver injury cases [involving Multaq (dronedarone)] and that the issue has been placed on the agenda for next week's monthly meeting of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP).
As always, we encourage you to submit a Comment if you have additional information or insight about this emerging drug safety issue concerning Multaq and liver failure, or know of someone who developed a possible drug-induced liver injury while using Multaq.
______________________________________________________________________________
DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal Information And News About Prescription Drug Side Effects
Drug Injury Case Evaluation - Free & Confidential
Full post as published by Drug Injury Watch on January 14, 2011 (boomark / email).
Bextra Product Recall
Find a Bextra Lawyer
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Pet Food Recall and Deaths
Dogs and Cats Sickened by Tainted Menu Food Products
Mitchell Report Summary
Report on Steroid Drug Use in Major League Baseball by Senator George Mitchell
Whats a Home Loan Modification?
How to Qualify for a Home Loan Modification
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Tarceva
Safety Data Show Association with Liver Failure and Death
Anzemet Pricing
Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to $22.7 million settlement for inflating drug prices.
Vytorin
alleged risk of heart attack and liver damage.
Trasylol
allegedly causing kidney and heart failure.
Digitek Recalled
the heart drug allegedly contains double the medication that it should
Drug Manufacturer Rebates
Caremark Corp. agrees to pay $38.5 million settlement after convincing doctors to switch drug brands.

Sanofi-Aventis v. Sandoz, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2010)
EU Antitrust Powers Not Enough for Dawn Raid
Ketek—What is it Good For Absolutely Nothing!
D.C. District Court Sides With FDA/Hospira/Teva, Against Sanofi-Aventis, in Eloxatin Case
Novo Nordisk Fails to Show Reasonable Likelihood of Success Over Sanofi








