Consumer Law

Massachusetts Supreme Court Stops Wells Fargo and US Bank Foreclosures

By Sam Glover

Today, the Massachusetts Supreme Court decided that if Wells Fargo and US Bank couldn’t keep track of their property, the court wasn’t going to help them take that property away from the consumers living in it. In other words, the “produce the note” strategy not only works, it is the law. At least in Massachusetts.

This decision could spill over into other states, since the foreclosure process in Massachusetts is similar to other states that permit non-judicial foreclosure. Besides, taking property without competent evidence kind of flies in the face of the Due Process Clause.

The Massachusetts court did point a way forward for the banks: valid assignments. Well, obviously. Unfortunately, the court also said the banks cannot go back and get retroactive assignments, so banks that kept similarly shoddy paperwork may be SOL for the mortgages they think they hold now.

Of course, my guess is that, rather than adopt the court’s reasonable, legal suggestion, the banks will spend millions of dollars lobbying Congress to overturn the Due Process Clause, or something.

Related posts:

• The U.S. Supreme Court gives the OCC the power to do nothing whatsoever to regulate and oversee national bank subsidiaries
  The Office of the Comptroller of Currency is the federal...


• Could Banks’ HAMP Shenanigans Put a Kink in Their Foreclosures?
  The Indiana Court of Appeals have suggested that banks that...


• Supreme Court cases I disagree with, part 1
  With all the stuff about Palin’s inability to come up...

Full post as published by Caveat Emptor on January 07, 2011 (boomark / email).