Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime and Consequences

Criminal Law

: Crime and Consequences

Medellin: What Would Congressional Implementation of Avena Look Like?

By Kent Scheidegger et al.

Despite all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. Texas, the holding is not all that remarkable. It has long been established that not all treaties are self-executing, and the Court held that the ones at issue here are not, based on their own language. Where adherence to a treaty is contrary to a statute, the President cannot override the statute unilaterally, but legislation is required. Far from making America a rogue nation, placement of the responsibility for treaty compliance in the political branches and not the judiciary is quite common in the world. So the ball is squarely in Congress's court. The United States, of course, should live up to its treaty commitments. What would a congressional implementation of International Court of Justice's decision in Avena look like? It should go as far as our treaty obligations require and not a nanometer further...continue to full post

Full post as published by Crime and Consequences on March 27, 2008 (boomark / email).