Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Florida Blogs -> South Florida Lawyers
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Florida
: South Florida LawyersJudge Cope's Views on Prejudgment Interest Adopted by Florida Supreme Court!
He's a schmartie, that Judge Cope (pictured above).
Back in 2009 he realized that it's pretty stupid that a trial court can't reserve on prejudgment interest, like it can on attorney's fees, and if it does the whole darn question of prejudgment interest will be waived if an appeal is taken.
So he and the 3d suggested -- very politely of course -- that maybe kinda oughta you know the Supremes should perhaps revisit the issue, and indeed, to their credit, they have:
The application of the McGurn rule has resulted in the inadvertent waiver of prejudgment interest where the trial court, often at the behest of the parties, enters a final judgment but reserves jurisdiction to award prejudgment interest. Because we conclude that the trial court should be allowed to decide the issue of prejudgment interest separately, we recede from McGurn and answer the following rephrased certified question in the affirmative:Isn't it nice to see solid rationality and logic from our judiciary sometimes?SHOULD A TRIAL COURT BE ALLOWED TO RESERVE JURISDICTION IN A FINAL JUDGMENT TO AWARD PREJUDGMENT INTEREST?In answering this rephrased certified question in the affirmative, our intent is to promote judicial economy and prevent unfairness to either party. We conclude that a final judgment reserving jurisdiction to award prejudgment interest is a final appealable order but that the trial court does not lose jurisdiction to determine prejudgment interest in a manner similar to that in which the trial court addresses attorneys? fees and costs.
Full post as published by South Florida Lawyers on December 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Canceled Insurance
Judge orders Health Net Inc. to pay $9 million settlement after terminating a policyholder's policy after being diagnosed with breast cancer.
Labor and Delivery
Judge awards mother $6 million medical malpractice settlement after baby was born with brain injuries.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Stock Market Losses
alleging bad financial advice and conflicts of interest.

Fourth District: Prejudgment Interest
Oh, About Computation of Prejudgment Interest. . .
Oregon Court of Appeals on pleading prejudgment interest
C.A. Finds that Award for Loss of Competitive Advantage Does Not Attract Prejudgment Interest
Prejudgment interest in South Carolina
Collecting Prejudgement Interest on Debts








