Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklyfirst look
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The next will address system issues in the representation of poor people through the lens of two cases, Simmons v. State Public Defender from the Iowa Supreme Court & State v. Mata from across the river in Nebraska.
John Wesley Hall, Jr., pegged Simmons when he noted it “is a remarkable opinion worthy of being a brief law review article itself considering the NLADA and ABA standards, cases considering “takings” of counsel’s time, counsel’s standing, and systemic ineffective assistance from a fee cap creating a disincentive for defense counsel to adequately perform in indigent criminal appeals.”
In Mata the Nebraska Supreme Court examines the farce that is pro se litigation in capital postconviction cases...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on November 29, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









