Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Employee organization may not rely of a FOIL request to obtain the names of charter school employees

Employee organization may not rely of a FOIL request to obtain the names of charter school employees
Matter of New York State United Teachers v Brighter Choice Charter School, 2010 NY Slip Op 08383, Decided on November 18, 2010, Court of Appeals

The New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) filed a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request with six Charter Schools* seeking, among other things, payroll records showing the full names, titles, corresponding salaries, and home addresses of all persons employed as teachers, instructors and faculty.**

The Charter Schools partially denied NYSUT's request, contending that full compliance would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy within the meaning of FOIL and ?the commercial and fund-raising exemption of Public Officers Law §89(2)(b)(iii).?

Ultimately the issue presented to the Court of Appeals concerned the disclosure of the teachers' full names, NYSUT having abandoned its request for home address information.

The Court of Appeals said that ?Charter schools are clearly subject to FOIL (see Education Law §2854[1][e]), meaning that they must maintain ?a record setting forth the name, public office address, title and salary of every officer or employee,? [and] ? [t]here is a presumption that such records must be made ?available for public inspection and copying? ? [although] an entity subject to FOIL may deny access to records*** that ?if disclosed would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,? which, as relevant here, includes the ?sale or release of lists of names and addresses if such lists would be used for commercial or fund-raising purposes? (Public Officers Law §89 [2][b][iii]).?

The court, reversing the Appellate Division, denied that part of NYSUT?s petition seeking disclosure of the names of the teachers employed by the Charter Schools, explaining that ordering disclosure of the names would do nothing to further the purpose of FOIL, "which is to assist the public in formulating intelligent informed choices with respect to both the direction and scope of governmental activities."

?If anything,? said the court, "it is precisely because no governmental purpose is served by public disclosure" of this information that §87 2)(b)(iii)'s privacy exemption falls squarely within FOIL's statutory scheme.?

As NYSUT, the court concluded, seeks the teachers' names for contacting prospective members, it ruled that ?although NYSUT certainly possesses a right to seek dues-paying members, it may not rely on FOIL to achieve that end.?

* Brighter Choice, Henry Johnson, Kipp Tech Valley, Albany Community, Albany Preparatory and Achievement Academy. None of the Charters Schools' teachers are members of a labor union.

** Subdivision 3(a) of §2859 of the State Education Law, in pertinent part, provides that ?An employee of a charter school shall be deemed to be a public employee solely for purposes of article fourteen of the civil service law, [The Taylor Law] except for section two hundred twelve of such law, and for no other purposes ?.? Education Law §2859 Subdivision (c-1) provides for the reasonable access to employees of a charter school "If employees of the charter school are not represented, .?.? [§2859, Subdivision (b), applies to ?The school employees of a charter school that has been converted from an existing public school,? while Section 2859, Subdivision (b-1), applies to ?The employees of a charter school that is not a conversion from an existing public school ??]

*** The custodian of the records or documents requested pursuant to FOIL may elect, but is not required, to withhold those items that are otherwise within the ambit of the several exemptions permitted by FOIL otherwise consistent with law. For example, the release of some public records is limited by statute [see, for example, Education Law, §1127 - Confidentiality of records; §33.13, Mental Hygiene Law - Clinical records; confidentiality].

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_08383.htm
NYPPL

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on November 19, 2010 (boomark / email).