ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Delaware IP Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Delaware IP Law Blog

Judge Thynge: Motion of issuance of letters rogatory for discovery into prosecution of an unrelated patent DENIED

By Karen E. Keller, Andrew A. Lundgren et al.

ADVERTISEMENTS

In a recent discovery dispute before Judge Thynge in a sham litigation case, plaintiff filed a motion to issue letters rogatory seeking discovery related to the prosecution of defendants? patents. Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott Laboratories, C.A. 08-126-SLR-MPT (D. Del. Nov. 2, 2010). Defendant asked that the court insert a restriction that plaintiff may not seek discovery about possible inequitable conduct during the prosecution of a patent not at issue in the litigation. Id. at 6. Plaintiff argued that possible inequitable conduct relating to the unrelated patent was relevant to ?whether the patent applicant was simultaneously engaging in inequitable conduct in connection with other patents for a different version of the same product,? and whether ?the history of the [unrelated patent] motivated [defendant and its non-party subsidiary] to engage in inequitable conduct in the prosecution of the [patents at issue].? Id. at 10. Judge Thynge denied plaintiff?s request, however, because plaintiff did not plead or argue in its briefs that the unrelated patent ?bears such an immediate and necessary relation to the enforcement of the [patents at issue] that a demonstration of inequitable conduct in the prosecution of the [unrelated patent] will render the [patents at issue] unenforceable.? Id. at 11. Allowing discovery into any inequitable conduct during the prosecution of the unrelated patent, ?would authorize a fishing expedition beyond that which is nominally permitted by the Federal Rules.? Id.

Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott Laboratories, C.A. 08-126-SLR-MPT (D. Del. Nov. 2, 2010)

Full post as published by Delaware IP Law Blog on November 05, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)