Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Marketing & PR Blogs -> Legal Marketing Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Marketing & PR
: Legal Marketing BlogABA May Destroy Internet Marketing Advantage for Solos and Small Firms
By Tom Kane
There has been a bit of a stir over the recent the ABA memo calling for comments on their 'Issues Paper Concerning Lawyers' Use of Internet Based Client Development Tools.' I became aware of the issue thanks to an email from Larry Bodine, who also raised the matter in a blog post.
Then, Brian Tannebaum chimed in with his take on bad, unethical marketers and lawyers (who undoubtedly also beat their wives, dogs and probably their own mothers – but I digress). His counterpoint was followed by Scott Greenfield's diatribe where he sides with Tannebaum, and includes comments by several others who responded to Bodine's initial 'Red Alert,' which called for the ABA to keep their dirty, rotten hands (Larry didn't actually say that) off Internet marketing.
All of this aside, as a marketer myself, I too have some concerns about the ABA getting involved in more regulation (to feed their bureaucracy, justify more staff, higher membership fees, etc. etc.), that also generally screws up legitimate marketing efforts. In this case, the value to the public gained by legal marketing on the Internet; but I also have concerns about unethical lawyers (and marketers) that spew out lies and misrepresentations about lawyer capabilities and experiences that too find their way to the Web.
But, let's not overlook the fact that the current ethics rules already prohibit such behavior. Do we need more regulation or better enforcement of existing rules? The point is that I don't trust the ABA to make new rules that will only in all probability muck up the advantage that solos, and small and medium-sized firms have on the Internet. By that I mean, the digital world provides some help in leveling the playing field for those lawyers who are just as good, but do not have the marketing budgets available to the BigLaw community.
So, if you are a solo, or a small law firm – and you blog, or take part in social media, or pay-per-click, or just have a website – you may want to read and comment on this issue paper. You have, according to the ABA until December 15, 2010 to submit your views on any or all of it. I don't think that anyone really believes the ABA won't regulate in this area. The question is will it be to your advantage or not.
If you don't respond, you really don't have a lot to complain about.
P.S. Also if you are a member of GP/Solo Section of the ABA (which supposedly is trying harder to serve the solo and small firm community better), you might just want to make sure they get your message as well.
Full post as published by Legal Marketing Blog on November 05, 2010 (boomark / email).
Gambling Governed by State Laws
State laws vary with respect to gambling
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
Vytorin Marketing
alleged false claims in marketing campaign.
Whole Foods
And Other Firms Sued by California Attorney General,
Financial Elder Abuse
allegedly taken advantage of in Southern California.
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.
Forest Laboratories Potentially Illegal Marketing
Forest Laboratories Potentially Illegal Marketing

Incorporated legal practices: benefits for solos and small firms
Solos and Small Firms Need PR Too
Small firms have a tech advantage
THIS is Why Solos Must Learn Technology and Think Globally
Tips for Marketing Your Business With Your Blog
Large Law Firms Cant Compete with Small Law Firms








