ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Mirror of Justice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Religion & Law

: Mirror of Justice

"Schism, Plague, and Late Rites"

ADVERTISEMENTS

Michael McConnell has posted on SSRN a new essay, "Schism, Plague, and Late Rites in the French Quarter:  The Strange Story Behind the Supreme Court's First Free Exercise Case."  Here's the abstract:

On November 9, 1842, Father Bernard Permoli performed an open casket funeral in the church of St. Augustin in the French Quarter of New Orleans, Louisiana. He blessed the body and offered the prayers specified by the doctrines and forms of the Roman Catholic Church. For this performance of the priestly function, he was prosecuted by the City, criminally convicted, and fined $50. The ceremony violated a city ordinance, passed thirteen days before, prohibiting open casket funerals at all ?Catholic Churches? of the city, other than a designated mortuary chapel on the outskirts of town. After he was charged for the violation, Permoli filed an answer claiming the protection of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.



Thus began a case that went all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Under the name of Permoli v. Municipality No. 1 of the City of New Orleans, it was the first Supreme Court case in which a party invoked the protections of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Unfortunately for Father Permoli, the Court rejected his argument, holding, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Catron, that the Free Exercise Clause does not apply to the acts of state and local governments. The case is now cited, along with Barron v. Baltimore, solely for the proposition that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states prior to the Fourteenth Amendment. Except for that, the case has largely been forgotten.



That is a loss. Not only do the arguments in the case tell us a great deal about the state of free exercise jurisprudence in the antebellum period; the case itself is a darned good story.

The essay will appear, I'm proud to say, in a volume of "First Amendment Stories", which Andy Koppelman and I are editing.  Coming soon to a bookstore near you!

Full post as published by Mirror of Justice on November 04, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0202 secs (new cache)