ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Education Law Blogs -> Edjurist

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Education Law

: Edjurist

Private School Tax Credits in Arizona

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Supreme Court held oral argument today in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, a case challenging Arizona's law which allows an individual taxpayer a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for donating to a state-approved K-12 private school "scholarship" organization.  Based on this recap of the argument, this law could be struck down based on the subtle distinction between a tax credit and a tax deduction.  For those of you unfamiliar with the distinction, the former reduces the amount of your income used to compute your tax bill, while the latter actually reduces your ultimate tax bill itself after it has already been computed.  If you have a choice between the two and all other factors are equal, take the credit over the deduction every day and twice on Sunday!  The gist of the plaintiffs' argument is that the Arizona credit amounts to the forgiveness of a debt to the state, and this is the equivalent of an expenditure made by the state (which is true in all other contexts that involve balance sheets). 

Justices Kagan and Kennedy appeared to be following the same intuitions about the case, as both were very concerned that, by forgiving, dollar-for-dollar, the tax obligations of donees to scholarship organizations that discriminate based on religion, the state could do through intermediaries what it could not do legally itself (i.e., fund religious discrimination).  The Chief Justice even seemed a bit sympathetic to that line of thinking.  This may end up a 6-3 decision striking the law down.

On the other hand, there is also an issue of "taxpayer standing" in the case, so the Court may punt, as it did in the Pledge of Allegiance case a few years back.  Watch this one closely. 

UPDATE: I forgot my manners: Hat tip to my good friend Cory Andrews for information on the case. 

Full post as published by Edjurist on November 03, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0122 secs (new cache)