Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance BlogHow Fair are Fairness Opinions?
By Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance
The recent acquisition of Bear Stearns by J.P. Morgan has cast a spotlight on the reliability of fairness opinions. On March 16, when the board of Bear Stearns agreed to sell the company for $2 a share, the investment banking firm Lazard Ltd., who was acting as Bear Stearns’ main adviser, provided the board with a fairness opinion that $2 a share was a fair price for the company, which was then teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. Eight days later, on March 24, when J.P. Morgan agreed to raise its offer to $10 a share to address shareholder discontent, the same investment bank issued a fairness opinion indicating that $10 a share was a fair price. If $10 a share is a fair price, how could $2 be a fair price as well?
This turn of events vividly illustrates how little has changed in the world of fairness opinions since the publication in 1989 of the first critical academic study of fairness opinions, Fairness Opinions: How Fair Are They and What Can Be Done About It? by Lucian Bebchuk and Marcel Kahan. This study highlighted two issues that generate serious problems with fairness opinions. First, investment banks have significant discretion in arriving at the fair price. Second, investment banks do not have incentives to provide an accurate valuation and might have incentives to provide a fairness opinion supporting the position of the party inviting the opinion. The study went on to advocate a judicial approach that takes these issues into account.
The Bear Stearns event suggests that the problems identified by the academic critics of fairness opinions might well persist. It also highlights the limits on the ability of investors and courts to rely on such opinions.
Full post as published by The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog on March 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
Disability Access
Developers pay $175,000 settlement for failing to comply with the Fair Housing Act.

The HA 2003 Liquidating Trust v. Credit Suisse Sec. (USA) LLC
Empiricial Study of U.S. Copyright Fair Use Opinions
A broad consensus, one way or another
Law of the Game on Joystiq: Used to be Fair
WSJ: The Rich Pay Their Fair Share (and They Would Pay More Under McCain's Tax Plan)







