Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Employment application fraud leads to disqualification for employment

Employment application fraud leads to disqualification for employment
Schindlar v Village of Lloyd Harbor, 261 AD2d 626

Providing false information in his application for appointment as a police officer resulted in Dennis Schindlar?s disqualification and removal from his position with the Village of Lloyd Harbor.

The Suffolk County Department of Civil Service, after holding a hearing, revoked the Schindlar?s certification and appointment as a police officer.

The department?s hearing officer determined that Schindlar had ?perpetrated a fraud in claiming residency in the Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor.? Schindlar had presented evidence that he resided in Lloyd Harbor, including copies of his driver?s license and voter registration cards. There was also testimony by the owner of the property on which he allegedly resided.

Section 50.4(f) of the Civil Service Law provides for the disqualification of individuals ?who has intentionally made a false statement of any material fact in his [or her] application.? A pre-disqualification hearing may be provided where appropriate, it but is not mandated by Section 50.4.

The key due process element in Section 50.4 provides that ?no person shall be disqualified ... unless he [or she] has been given a written statement of the reasons ... and afforded an opportunity to make an explanation and to submit facts in opposition to such disqualification.?

The Appellate Division noted that notwithstanding such evidence submitted by Schindlar, the hearing officer ?credited the persuasive documentary evidence to the contrary.? The court said that it was well established that a reviewing court may not weigh evidence or reject the choice made by the hearing officer, especially where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists.

Finding that there was substantial evidence in the record to sustain a finding that Schindlar did not in fact reside in Lloyd Harbor during the period in question, the court affirmed Schindlar?s disqualification by the department.
NYPPL

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on October 22, 2010 (boomark / email).