Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Illinois Medical Malpractice BlogIllinois Justice Defends Ruling Protecting Rights of Patient Victim Rights
By Steven M. Levin and John J. Perconti
Illinois Supreme Court Justice Thomas Kilbride has been under fire lately for a vote that he cast in a recent high profile state case. The decision revolved around a challenge to the 2005 state law that placed a cap on the amount of damages that could be received by a victim of medical malpractice.
Justice Kilbride, soon to be the high court?s next Chief Justice, voted earlier this year to invalidate the law as violating the state constitution?s demand of separation of powers. In addition, there was precedential support for the ruling, consider a similar ban had been rejected a few decades before.
In a recent interview with the Peoria Journal Star the justice highlighted the logic behind the decision. He explained that the court did not make the ruling based on personal policy arguments for or against health care premiums and patient need. Instead, as is the specific job of our judges, Kilbride considered the law only in its constitutional dimension
The law had specifically limited the damages that victims could be awarded in certain categories, regardless of the specific facts of the case. That meant that an impartial jury could hear an entire case, understand the arguments, evaluate the evidence, be presented facts about the losses suffered, reach a decision based on that process and then have that decision rejected. As Justice Kilbride made clear, victims of medical malpractice, just like anyone else, deserve a fair hearing in the courtroom. It is an overreach of legislative power to take away that basic access to the court.
Our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys at Levin & Perconti support the logical, fair, constitutionally sound decision reached by the state?s highest court on this issue. Illinois is stronger because of the logical approach reached by Justice Kilbride and the other members of the high court.
Full post as published by Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog on October 02, 2010 (boomark / email).
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Anna Nicole Smith's Legal Troubles
Court cases and legal issues related to Anna Nicole Smith
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Windsor Healthcare Management
allegedly provided substandard care and neglected the rights of its senior residents.

Interesting new paper on victims rights to restitution in Illinois
What do ape rights mean for human rights
Iowa Chief Justice defends decision to redefine marriage
Home is Where the Institution is, in Illinois
R (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice - WLR Daily
JUSTICE: DoJ stalling on protecting voting rights of military UPDATE: Related: Military voter







