ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Real Estate & Property Law

: inversecondemnation

Another Podcast On The Judicial Takings Case (Stop The Beach Renourishment v. Florida)

By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)

ADVERTISEMENTS

You may have missed the live program, but it's still not too late to get the podcast of a recent discussion of Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (June 17, 2010), the Supreme Court case about judicial takings and beachfront property. Here's the course description from ALI-ABA:

In an unusual takings case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Supreme Court relied on state real property law to conclude that the objecting beachfront property owners lacked a valid property right, and thus the state could "renourish" the beaches. The beachfront owners appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking it to recognize a new doctrine of judicial takings.

On June 17, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its opinion, which may be a partial victory for property-rights advocates. Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito all endorsed the idea that the Takings Clause applies to all three branches of government. But the case leaves significant questions about the broader concept of judicial takings. These questions are either unanswered or under-analyzed, and there does not appear to be a consensus about how to go forward.

Join our panel of experts as they explore the questions arising from the decision. Registrants will have the opportunity to submit questions to the faculty prior to and during the program.

James Burling (Pacific Legal Foundation), Richard Frank (U.C. Davis), and Steven Eagle (George Mason) were on the panel.

Note: at the ABA Annual Meeting in August in San Francisco, we put on a live program which included Mr. Burling and Professor Frank (in addition to Professor John Echeverria and Dan Stengle, Esq., counsel for the petitioners). We are in the process of repeating the session in a teleconference. Stay tuned for more about that.

Full post as published by inversecondemnation on September 04, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0028 secs (from cache 11/03/26 04:55:00)