Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumNunc pro tunc prospective client?
ADVERTISEMENTS
A nunc pro tunc prospective client? In this disciplinary opinion, the Indiana Supreme Court conceded that the information that a woman shared with a lawyer had not been shared in the role of prospective client. Later, the woman asked the lawyer for a recommendation, the lawyer recommended a second lawyer in the same firm, and the woman hired that second lawyer. A few months after that, while in a social setting, the first lawyer revealed the woman's confidence to a third party. The court ruled that the first lawyer breached 1.9(c). (h/t:Indiana Law Blog)
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on August 30, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Daimler Chrysler et al.
alleged negligence pertaining to lost confidential client data which exposed customers to identity theft
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

In Re Warren (9th Cir. - June 18, 2009)
Nunc Pro Tunc State Order Shortening Probation Did Not Negate Sentencing Increase
Nunc Pro Tunc Order Could Not Revise Judgment to Cure Late Appeal
Interplay of State & Federal Sentences Addressed
No Disbarment In Light Of Recovery From Addiction
Confidentiality And Prospective Clients







