Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Advisory arbitration recommendation neither binding on the parties nor subject to "confirmation" pursuant to CPLR Article 75

Advisory arbitration recommendation neither binding on the parties nor subject to "confirmation" pursuant to CPLR Article 75
CSEA Local 1000 v Nassau County, Appellate Division, 251 A.D.2d 328

The CSEA and Nassau County submitted a grievance to advisory arbitration. The arbitrator issued an ?advisory recommendation? in CSEA?s favor. When the county refused to implement the arbitrator?s recommendation, CSEA brought an action pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules in an effort to ?confirm? the recommendation, thereby requiring the county to implement it.

The Appellate Division affirmed a Supreme Court justice?s dismissal of CSEA?s Article 75 petition. The Court explained that under the circumstances, ?the advisory arbitrator?s recommendation never became binding upon the County.?

The decision points out the significant difference between binding arbitration and advisory arbitration.

In binding arbitration, the prevailing party is able to enforce an award issued by the arbitrator through an Article 75 proceeding. No similar procedure is available to the prevailing party in an advisory arbitration.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on July 27, 2010 (boomark / email).