Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> HIPAA Health Law & Technology
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: HIPAA Health Law & TechnologyProposed HITECH Regulations Require Business Associates to Police Subcontractors Receiving PHI
By Elizabeth Litten
On Thursday, July 8, 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced proposed modifications to the HIPAA Privacy & Security Rules implementing the HITECH Act. The proposed modifications include new requirements on business associates with regard to their subcontractors.
The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within HHS proposes to include in the definition of 'business associate' in § 160.103 subcontractors that create, receive, maintain, or transmit protected health information on behalf of a business associate. OCR specifies that it does not intend this proposed modification to mean that a covered entity is required to have a contract with the subcontractor. Rather, the 'obligation is to remain with the business associate who contracts with the subcontractor.' In § 164.308(b)(2), OCR proposes 'to make clear that it is the business associate that must obtain the required satisfactory assurances from the subcontractor to protect the security of electronic protected health information.'
The proposed rule casts business associates into a much more active role, requiring them to enter into business associate agreements (BAAs) with their subcontractors. In effect, business associates would be expected to act as though they are covered entities in terms of identifying when protected health information (PHI) is transmitted to third parties and policing the privacy and security of PHI whenever it flows downstream or outside the business associate workforce.
Because a covered entity with which a business associate has contracted still has an ultimate responsibility for the privacy and security of the PHI of its patients or clients, existing BAAs may require further review and amendments to protect the covered entity sufficiently should this rule be adopted.
Full post as published by HIPAA Health Law & Technology on July 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Darvon
Other Propoxyphene-Containing Meds to Require Stronger Warnings
Colon Cancer Patients May Not Be Receiving Proper Care
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
Mel Harris and Associates Debt Collection
Face Class Action for Alleged "Sewer Service" Practices
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
John Vermillion and Associates LLC et al.
allegedly misrepresented themselves as qualified financial advisers to sell living trusts and exploit senior citizens.

Proposed § 104 Regs Eliminate Requirement That Damages be Based on "Tort or Tort Type Rights"
HITECH Act: We are from the U.S. Government & we are here to help.
HITECH Act: Mandatory HIPAA Audits!
EHR & HITECH/HIPAA: Mother of Wicked Problems: Part V
The Security Rule Under HITECH: a Business Associate's Perspective
PROPOSED RULE CHANGES: "Proposed Changes to Advertising Regulations"








