Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> California Employee Rights Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: California Employee Rights BlogUse Caution When Posting Online About Employers
By James Peters
If you have not heard about this, a Best Buy employee recently got into trouble for creating and posting a video poking fun at the iPhone and Apple in general.
Although the video was more of a parody based on observations about iPhones and those who buy them, Best Buy understandably did not take kindly to an employee publicly criticizing one of its major customers (and also those who shop at Best Buy).
The employee was suspended during the investigation and it seemed to be just a matter of time before he was terminated, but Best Buy quickly withered under the harsh public backlash from the ?geek? community and the company back-pedaled, citing their desire to promote a ?supportive environment? for its employees as motivating their decision.
Best Buy publicly offered the employee his job back via a press-release, but he actually released a statement of his own essentially telling them he did not want his job back after being treated the way he was by Best Buy.
I am going to take the rare step of siding with the employer on this one. The video the employee created (which I admit as an Android user I found uproariously funny) was watched by millions and at least briefly affected some of the public?s views on Apple, the iPhone and Best Buy. I have to assume that Best Buy is one of the largest distributors of iPhones besides Apple directly and AT&T, so this employee?s actions caused the company at the very least a great deal of embarrassment.
After reading some of the informal commentary on the internet about this story (e.g. ?He should sue them!?), I will offer up the following advice on the implications of California Employment law: contrary to popular belief, the First Amendment has nothing to do with this case and only protects citizens from government action. Except in limited circumstances that do not seem to apply to this situation, employers are free to terminate an employee for anything they post on the internet that is critical of them or their affiliates.
In sum, if you would not say it to your boss?s face, don?t post it on the internet where he can see it because he is free to respond as if you had.
Spam-Fighter:5345#$@#*$Tags
California Employment Law | Policy : Opinion | Privacy | Retaliation | Wrongful Termination
Related Posts
Full post as published by California Employee Rights Blog on July 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Online Medication Sites
Prescription Drugs Sold Without Prescriptions
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.

Social networking effect on job applicants
Be Aware: Some NYU Job Fair employers capping number of resumes they receive
Employers Increasingly Using Social Networks to Screen Job Candidates
DOL Releases Online Disability Law Advisor
Love bugs: E-cards that carry viruses








