ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Canadian Immigration Blawg
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Canadian Immigration BlawgBy immlawyer
ADVERTISEMENTS
Sharma Harsanyi In the News (Calgary Sun, July 4, 2010):'Quashed Torture Conviction Derails Deportation"
Nadia Moharib
Having his criminal conviction for torturing a snitch quashed has renewed an Iraqi man?s fight against a deportation order.
A new trial has been ordered for the man whose deportation order was based on that overturned guilty verdict as well as a long history of crime.
...
Ibrahim boasted a lengthy criminal record at the time, including a 2002 conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, kidnapping and assault with a weapon and was serving a conditional sentence for a weapons conviction.
In 2004, he was handed a deportation order based on serious criminality,
A three-year stay of deportation was granted in 2006 with the possibility it could become permanent if Ibrahim showed good behaviour, says one of his lawyers.
As a result of the 2008 convictions, the stay was cancelled and deportation order was again enforceable.
The prospect of a new trial, conceivably, means the possibility of being acquitted of torture-related allegations.
And, says Ibrahim?s immigration lawyer, Raj Sharma, given the conviction no longer exists the stay should be reinstated making the ultimate fight against deportation even more viable.
?The conviction doesn?t exist anymore,? Sharma says.
...
?Mr. Ibrahim is in the unenviable position of dealing with very serous criminal matters and at the same time facing very serious consequences? should he be deported, Sharma says.
?The immigration decision was based on a conviction that has now been quashed.
?Why should my client suffer under the threat of an enforceable deportation order when the conviction has been set aside??
This week, Sharma put an application before immigration officials to revisit the decision to cancel his stay of deportation.
Sharma represented reputed gangster, Jackie Tran, garnering several legal victories delaying his ultimate deportation and prompting critics to lash out at loopholes in the immigration system.
The lawyer defends his pursuits on behalf of Ibrahim.
?There?s no ?working-of-the-system,?? he says.
?Whatever legal avenues are there for my client, I will take them and if I don?t, I would argue that?s unethical.
?The presumption of innocence is the fundamental principle in our legal system.?
Ibrahim, who was denied bail, remains in custody.
...
Full post as published by Canadian Immigration Blawg on July 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









