ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> PomTalk

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: PomTalk

Court says: Don't Enter Here

By Susan Weiswasser

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Supreme Court has been pretty tough on plaintiffs lately. In Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, the Court held that federal courts cannot hear a party's challenge to the enforceability of an arbitration agreement unless the party specifically challenges the arbitrator's power to hear that dispute.

In this particular case, Jackson, a Rent-a-Center employee, filed an employment discrimination suit in federal court. Rent-a-Center sought to stay the case based on an arbitration clause in the employment contract that included the agreement that the arbitrator would determine the enforceability of the contract. Jackson claimed the contract was unenforceable as unconscionable under state law and that under the Federal Arbitration Act a federal court has the power to determine the threshold question of unconscionability. The district court dismissed Jackson's claim and compelled arbitration but the Ninth Circuit reversed, agreeing with Jackson that such a "threshold question . . . is for the court" and not the arbitrator.

The Supreme Court reversed stating that "[i]f a party challenges the validity under [FAA] §2 of the precise agreement to arbitrate at issue, the federal court must consider the challenge before ordering compliance with that agreement under [FAA] §4." Jackson's argument failed, however, because he "challenged only the validity of the contract as a whole."

According to the dissenting opinion, by Justice Stevens; a press release from Public Citizen, co-counsel in the case; and other commentators, the decision will create nearly insurmountable hurdles for individuals attempting to challenge unconscionable arbitration clauses drawn up by corporations for whom they work or do business with. The Arbitration Fairness Act, which, among other things, bans certain pre-dispute arbitration agreements and expressly grants power to federal courts to determine the enforceability of most arbitration agreements, has lingered in Congress for several years.

Full post as published by PomTalk on July 01, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0138 secs (new cache)