Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> PomTalk
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: PomTalkCourt says: Don't Enter Here
By Susan Weiswasser
The Supreme Court has been pretty tough on plaintiffs lately. In Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, the Court held that federal courts cannot hear a party's challenge to the enforceability of an arbitration agreement unless the party specifically challenges the arbitrator's power to hear that dispute.
In this particular case, Jackson, a Rent-a-Center employee, filed an employment discrimination suit in federal court. Rent-a-Center sought to stay the case based on an arbitration clause in the employment contract that included the agreement that the arbitrator would determine the enforceability of the contract. Jackson claimed the contract was unenforceable as unconscionable under state law and that under the Federal Arbitration Act a federal court has the power to determine the threshold question of unconscionability. The district court dismissed Jackson's claim and compelled arbitration but the Ninth Circuit reversed, agreeing with Jackson that such a "threshold question . . . is for the court" and not the arbitrator.
The Supreme Court reversed stating that "[i]f a party challenges the validity under [FAA] §2 of the precise agreement to arbitrate at issue, the federal court must consider the challenge before ordering compliance with that agreement under [FAA] §4." Jackson's argument failed, however, because he "challenged only the validity of the contract as a whole."
According to the dissenting opinion, by Justice Stevens; a press release from Public Citizen, co-counsel in the case; and other commentators, the decision will create nearly insurmountable hurdles for individuals attempting to challenge unconscionable arbitration clauses drawn up by corporations for whom they work or do business with. The Arbitration Fairness Act, which, among other things, bans certain pre-dispute arbitration agreements and expressly grants power to federal courts to determine the enforceability of most arbitration agreements, has lingered in Congress for several years.
Full post as published by PomTalk on July 01, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
NCAA and Ticketmaster
alleging they have a monopoly on college sports events and charge non-refundable fees to enter a lottery for the rights to purchase tickets to the sporting events.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.

Does One Enter Into or Enter a Contract
Do Police Need Probable Cause to Enter a Home to Execute an Arrest Warrant
"Supreme Court Poised to Enter Pre-Emption Debate"
U.S. Supreme Court's new entrance








