Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportGreenspan v. LADT (Cal. Ct. App. - June 25, 2010)
By Shaun Martin
ADVERTISEMENTS
An arbitrator is hearing two cases against you. He decides the first one against you. The second one's pending. What should you do?Here's an example of what you should not do.
Filing a lawsuit against the arbitrator as a means of trying to disqualify him ain't gonna work. Plus, it might make hiim . . . uh, a bit displeased. Sufficiently displeased that a $6 million-plus judgment against you in the second lawsuit won't be at all surprising.
Not going to work.
Word to the wise.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on June 28, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Did Greenspan try to quash a housing-bubble debate
Reinhart explains that Greenspan quote
"Alan Greenspan" Means Never Having to Say Your Sorry
Rand Follower Greenspan Wakes Up to Reality








