Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Blog of Rights
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: Blog of RightsKentucky Court Blocks Unconstitutional Prosecutions of Pregnant Women
By Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, Reproductive Freedom Project
Today, in the case Cochran v. Commonwealth, the Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed that a pregnant woman cannot be thrown in jail for no other reason than that she struggles with a substance abuse problem. (Together with the ACLU of Kentucky, the ACLU submitted an amicus brief in the case). We are thrilled with the decision, of course — it is a huge victory not only for Ina Cochran, who has been fighting this case for four years, but for the other women currently facing similar prosecutions throughout the state.
In its decision, the court recognized that prosecuting a woman who struggles with addiction has several consequences — all of which undermine the health of moms and babies. Medical organizations are nearly unanimous in opposing these sorts of prosecutions because they drive women away from the very people who can help them.
The court left no doubt that, not only do these prosecutions make for bad public health policy, they also make for bad law. If a pregnant woman can be charged with a crime for potentially harming her fetus, then literally everything she does or does not do — including choosing to have a baby despite an underlying health condition — could land her in jail. What if a pregnant woman has a glass of wine with dinner now and then, or lives with a smoker; what if she drives over the speed limit, fails to get regular pre-natal care, or works in a coal mine, as many women in Kentucky do?
As the ACLU made clear in its brief, allowing the government to exercise such unlimited control over women's bodies, and every aspect of their lives, would essentially reduce pregnant women to second-class citizens, denying them the basic constitutional rights enjoyed by the rest of us.
Today, Ms. Cochran's long legal battle has come to an end. There should no longer be any question: Ms. Cochran never should have been charged. The women whose similar prosecutions are still pending never should have been charged either. Let's hope — for the sake of all women in Kentucky — that the prosecutors get the message.
Full post as published by Blog of Rights on June 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Steps to avoid
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women
New York, NY and the NYPD
alleging false arrest for violating an unconstitutional anti-loitering law.
Kentucky lawyers
fraud case ends in mistrial.
Two Kentucky Counties
settle strip search class action lawsuits
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Kentucky Court Blocks Unconstitutional Prosecutions Of Pregnant Women
ACLU-KY: Court says pregnant women cant be charged for taking drugs
Stone-Manista on Child Abuse Prosecutions of Pregnant Drug Addicts
New TX Law Requires Health Care Providers to Test Pregnant Women for HIV
Kentucky sex offender residency statute unconstitutional when applied retroactively








