Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Election-Campaign Law Blogs -> Election Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Election-Campaign Law
: Election UpdatesAbsentee ballot snafu in New Jersey illustrates the need for careful ballot handling procedures
By Paul Gronke
This story out of Passaic County is not another story about absentee ballots and vote fraud. But it is a cautionary tale about how important ballot handling procedures can be when new voting systems are implemented.
The basic summary is this: a county clerk found 49 uncounted mail in ballots while “handling” the ballots after the election. Even though the envelopes had been time-stamped indicating that they had arrived on time, the clerk chose not to count them because the election results had already been announced. A judge overturned this decision, and once counted, a different winner was declared.
What I found most curious, and disturbing, about the story is this quote:
?Ken Hirrman, an office administrator with the Passaic County Board of Elections, said he discovered the 49 ballots Tuesday while handling the mail-in ballots.
Hirmann said he noticed the uncounted ballots because they were enclosed in thicker envelopes, indicating that they had not been opened and counted.?
I have witnessed a lot of vote by mail and absentee balloting systems and have interviewed dozens of election officials about their administrative procedures. I can’t imagine putting in place a system whereby the situation above could possibly occur. This means that the ballot, still inside the secrecy sleeve, and then still inside the stamped envelope, somehow made it through the slicing process, the signature verification process, the separation of the outside envelope from the inner ballot process, and finally the tallying process, and no one noticed that there were still intact envelopes in the batch?
New Jersey has only recently gone to no-excuse absentee and permanent absentee. I hope they have also paid attention to some of the long established ballot handling procedures put in place in CA, OR, WA, IA, and many other states.
Full post as published by Election Updates on June 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
New Jersey Employment Law
alleged violations of New Jersey state labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
$600,000 Settlement with LINA and CIGNA for Claims Handling Violations in California
$600,000 Settlement with LINA and CIGNA for Claims Handling Violations in California
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.
$31 Million Verdict
Against Camden New Jersey
Hep B, HIV Scare
2,800 New Jersey Residents Urged to Get Tested

"Ballot snafu endangers votes"
von Spakovsky on Absentee Ballot Fraud
"ACLU Asks Court to Allow Rejected Absentee Ballot Applications"
New Jersey School Issue Vote Postponed Because of Holy Day Conflict
On the House calendar today: the Absentee Ballot Track, Receive, and Confirm Act







