ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Point of Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Point of Law

Federal preemption, falling away in the motor vehicle safety bill

By Carter Wood

ADVERTISEMENTS

The House Energy and Commerce Committee, chaired by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), has today been marking up H.R. 5381, the Motor Vehicle Safety Act. Waxman's manager's amendment adds in language (see the extended entry) that would end federal preemption for motor vehicle safety regulations. Not only would future National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rules be affected, the anti-preemption language would apply to everything NHTSA promulgated since 2005.

An effort by Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO) to strip out the preemption language was defeated, 28-18, on a partyline vote, the Democrats winning the vote.

The amendment had circulated at the subcommittee level, but was not offered, by Rep. Bruce Braley (D-IA), a trial lawyer who formerly headed the Iowa Trial Lawyers Association. (See earlier POL post.)

The Waxman amendment did not include Braley's original language to expand liability for car rental and leasing companies (revoking the Graves Act).

UPDATE (2:30 p.m.): The Energy and Commerce Committee just reported out the bill on a 31-21 vote. Really a trial lawyer bonanza, and for more than just the preemption language.

UPDATE (2:55 p.m.): Why make 2005 the year that retroactivity extends to? The American Association of Justice, which works diligently against federal preemption, identifes the following in its timeline, "The Evolution of Unauthorized Agency Preemption":

June 22, 2005 - The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issues a proposed rule regarding designated seating position that contains NHTSA's first attempt to broadly preempt state common law claims. This rule went largely unnoticed by the public. 70 Fed. Reg. at 36101-02.

August 19, 2005 - NHTSA issues a proposed rule on roof crush strength with a weak standard and a preamble that explicitly preempts all state law requirements and state tort law. 70 Fed. Reg. at 49223.

August 19, 2005 - NHTSA issues a proposed rule for average fuel economy standards for light trucks for 2008-11 with brief express and implied preemption language. 70 Fed. Reg. at 51457.

September 12, 2005 - NHTSA issues a proposed rule regarding rearview mirrors which seeks to preempt all state statutes, regulations, and common law. 70 Fed. Reg. at 53768-69.


Full post as published by Point of Law on May 26, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0089 secs (from cache 11/05/26 09:46:17)