Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawThe statute of limitations to challenge an administrative decision starts to run when the determination becomes ?final and binding?
Fager v Board of Educ., Rochester City School Dist., 2010 NY Slip Op 04003, decided on May 7, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Kevin Fager appealed the Supreme Court?s dismissal of his Article 78 petition after Supreme Court ruled that was untimely.
The Appellate Division said that ?Supreme Court erred? in granting the school district?s motion to dismiss Fager?s petition as time-barred and reversed the lower court?s ruling.
The court observed that "A CPLR Article 78 proceeding must be commenced within four months after the determination sought to be reviewed becomes final and binding?..?
When does a decision become final and binding: ?when it definitively impacts and aggrieves the party seeking judicial review."
In this instance the Appellate Division found that Fager had filed his Article 78 action less than four months after school district?s determination became final and binding.
N.B. A request submitted to the administrator or administrative body making the "final" determination for ?reconsideration? of the decision does not toll the running of the relevant statute of limitations.
The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_04003.htm
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Parmalat SpA
Italy's biggest dairy company awaits final approval for a securities settlement that would pay investors $10.5 million

Statute of Limitations Under NY Civil Service Law Commences When The Decision Is Final
Court Holds Statute of Limitations for Telephone Bills is Only Two Years
Statute of Limitations in Matrimonial Legal Malpractice
Collections: Statute of Limitations, Again
Denial of Rule 33 Motion Began Running of 2255 Statute of Limitations
Statute of Limitations: Exceptions







