ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyA good week gets better
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Two favorable decision out of Texas, one on Penry & one on Atkins. These opinions make the fourth & fifth opinions spotted so far this week, with Florida & Pennsylvania believed likely to weigh in Thursday
Ex Parte Mark Roberston, No. AP-74,720 (Tex. Crim. App. 03/12/2008) (unpublished) “The convicting court found that applicant presented mitigating evidence, for which under Penry I there had to be an adequate means for the jury to consider beyond the limits of the special issues, that applicant had requested such a means, and that when presented with the nullification instruction, applicant objected that it still did not give the jury a proper means to consider his mitigating evidence. Based on our review of the record, we adopt those findings and agree that relief should be granted...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on March 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









