Disability Law

SSP and NSSTA 2010 Annual Meetings - 7

By Patrick Hindert

Tax laws and tax policy are critically important for structured settlements. Based upon interviews he conducted with structured settlement industry leaders, Jeremy Babener states in his recently published article about "Structured Settlements and Single-Claimant Qualified Settlement Funds":

"It seems roundly agreed that the ......structured settlement market owes its existence almost entirely to the tax subsidy."

With major tax reform predicted for 2011, both the SSP and NSSTA tax panels provided valuable and generally positive news and information plus new tax ideas for growing the structured settlement market. For a list of the SSP and NSSTA tax panel participants, see SSP and NSSTA - 6.

The most positive tax information was the declaration of support for structured settlements during the NSSTA meeting by key Congressmen including Max Baucus, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee; Sander Levin, Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee; and David Camp, ranking Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee.

Congressman Camp provided the most concise tax-oriented legislative endorsement of structured settlements. Camp stated: "With tax reform, everything is on the table. But structured settlements are not on the table. Congress has a long history of support for structured settlements on a bi-partisan basis. Don't expect much debate over structured settlements."

The new tax ideas for growing the structured settlement market were highlighted by Babener in his precursor presentation to the SSP tax panel titled: "Justifying and Expanding the Structured Settlement Tax Subsidy". Among Babener's ideas for improving and growing the structured settlement market, he recommends changing the current tax subsidy into a tax credit. According to Babener, who outlines his proposal in an article published in Tax Notes titled "Expanding the Structured Settlement Tax Exclusion", the current tax subsidy provides no benefit for structured settlement recipients unless they pay taxes - which many of whom do not. Babener's article is available on his Tax Structuring website.

Both the SSP and NSSTA 2010 tax panels featured Michael Montemurro, Branch Chief, Office of Associate General Counsel of the IRS. SSP has featured Montemurro on two prior tax panels.

Both the SSP and NSSTA tax panels addressed many of the same issues:

• Single claimant 468B settlement funds;
• Physical vs. non-physical personal injuries;
• Non-qualified assignments - including structured attorney fees;

NSSTA's tax panel also discussed tax issues related to confidentiality agreements and factoring by assignment companies.

By contrast with NSSTA, SSP allotted more than two hours (compared with NSSTA's one hour) for its tax panel. In addition, SSP offered Babener's introductory public policy discussion plus 40 minutes of follow-up discussion. The added time allowed SSP to incorporate Michael Montemurro into a broader discussion which included practical advice (Dan Hindert discussing 468B QSFs), criticism of current tax laws (Professors Gregg Polsky and Brant Hellwig attacking tax deferrals for non-physical injuries and plaintiff attorneys fees) plus extended public policy discussions including secondary market issues.

Both SSP and NSSTA deserve congratulations for their 2010 structured settlement tax panels. SSP's tax panel (organized and moderated by Richard Risk) has become the new industry standard - surpassing what NSSTA formerly and regularly featured as its "Tax Posse". NSSTA's 2010 tax panel (organized and moderated by Michael Miller) re-established NSSTA as an important educational resource for structured settlement tax issues.

For prior S2KM reporting about SSP and NSSTA, see S2KM's structured settlement wiki.

Full post as published by Beyond Structured Settlements on May 12, 2010 (boomark / email).