Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> AFL-CIO NOW BLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: AFL-CIO NOW BLOGJoin the Debate on Fair/Free Trade
By Tula Connell
Those of us in the union movement know pitting “free” trade against “fair” trade is a false dichotomy: Making trade agreements that ensure basic standards for workers and the environment?fair trade?does not exclude trade deals that open markets and move goods?”free” trade.
With that caveat in mind, we want to point out an opportunity to take part in a debate sponsored by the British publication, The Economist, which tackles the
tension between freedom and fairness and [tries] to resolve whether action on one front is more important, and what forms such action might take.
The “Open for Debate” forum features two economists with arguments for/against fair trade and an opportunity to vote in the debate and add your view. In an oddly British twist, you can change your vote as many times as you wish, but you get only one vote. You’ll need to sign up, but it’s free. Comments are moderated.
Today, AFL-CIO chief economist Thea Lee is the first featured guest columnist in the debate and succinctly sums up the bottom line need for fair trade:
In a competitive global economy, individual corporations do what they are designed to do: maximize profits within the framework of rules they are given. Individual corporations should not be the sole arbiters of where to draw the line on child or forced labor or respect for freedom of association, if their host country does not impose or enforce such rules. And the governments of individual developing countries are understandably reluctant to impose such rules if their neighbours and competitors do not. Yet it is both morally repugnant and economically inefficient for global trade and investment patterns to be driven by competitive undermining of basic human rights and environmental responsibilities.
This is why international minimum standards for labour (reflecting the International Labor Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work) and the environment (reflecting international environmental agreements and treaties) are needed to balance competing interests in the global economy.
Right now, the motion in support of fair trade is trailing that of unfettered, no-holds barred, forget-about-workers’-rights trade. Take a second to add your vote.
Full post as published by AFL-CIO NOW BLOG on May 05, 2010 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Disability Access
Developers pay $175,000 settlement for failing to comply with the Fair Housing Act.

The Heart of the Free Trade Debate
CIPO Updates: Patents & Trade-marks
White House Fact Sheet: Expanding Economic Opportunities Through Free and Fair Trade
China-US Trade -- Why Can't We Be Friends, Someday
Debate On Copyright And Fair Use








