Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawRequesting the reconsideration of an administrative determination does not toll the statute of limitations for bring an Article 78 action
Matter of Barresi v County of Suffolk, 2010 NY Slip Op 03439, Decided on April 27, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department
Philip R. Barresi?s request for line-of-duty benefits under General Municipal Law §207-c, which was denied by the Suffolk County Department of Risk Management on January 31, 1992.
According to Barresi, the review of the denial of his claim for these benefits was placed on hold pending a decision on his Worker's Compensation claim. The Workers' Compensation claim was decided on March 15, 2001.
Ultimately, Barresi?s application for §207-c was rejected by Suffolk County and on September 20, 2001, the Suffolk County Sheriff's Department told him that no further action would be taken regarding his claim for benefits.
Subsequently Barresi sued, but his Article 78 action was dismissed as untimely.
The Appellate Division pointed out that ?even if we consider this correspondence from [Barresi?s] counsel to be a demand upon the respondent Suffolk County Sheriff's Department and that [Suffolk?s] letter in reply to be a denial of benefits or a refusal to take further action, then the statute of limitations for [Barresi?s] CPLR Article 78 proceeding expired at the latest four months after September 20, 2001.?
Furthermore, said the court, although Barresi contended that there was internal correspondence between parties from 2007 involving his request for the review of his claim for benefits, such correspondence ?cannot be considered anything more than a request for reconsideration, and did not have the effect of reviving [Barresi?s] claim or tolling the statute of limitations.?
The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_03439.htm
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Dollar Tree Stores Hourly Employees Bring Class Action
Dollar Tree Stores Hourly Employees Bring Class Action
Nestle USA
Recalls Toll House Refrigerated Cookie Dough Products
Parents Bring Federal Lawsuit After Tainted Baby Formula Injures Newborn
Parents Bring Federal Lawsuit After Tainted Baby Formula Injures Newborn
LA Wildfires
Bring Widespread Destruction
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement

Requests for reconsideration of a decision fail to toll the statute of limitations
CA1: defective IFP Applications toll statutes of limitations
Silence by Developer in Response to Demand to Repair Might Be Enough to Toll Statute of Limitations
Statute of Limitations Defense to Debt Collection Not So Fast
Comparative Fault and Statutes of Limitations (HB 643)
Claimant Fails to Avoid Statute of Limitations With Late-Filed Petition







