Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizFurther in the Pangilinan matter
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
The paper was a multi-student effort, and two of the students plagiarized their contributions to the paper. The non-plagiarizing students did suffer.
Returning to the Pangilinan matter, the plagiarism concerned a graduation speech given by Pangilinan. The speech was apparently ghost-written, so that Pangilinan himself may have been unaware of the plagiarism (so-called inadvertent or unintentional plagiarism). Nevertheless, Pangilinan resigned and, even in the face of a refusal to accept the resignation, Pangilinan persisted. Pangilinan did the honorable thing, even though these circumstances were murky as to "knowing bad acts" by Pangilinan. It may separately be the case that the university needed Pangilinan more than Pangilinan needed the university.
An irony here is that Pangilinan, a businessman, is not within the realm of academics, from where most of the taboos of plagiarism arise. Nevertheless, Pangilinan dealt promptly and concisely with the problem, unlike the situation with academics such as Laurence Tribe, Doris Kearns-Goodwin, Glenn Poshard or Professor Sticklen of Michigan State, all of whom committed acts far worse than what Pangilinan did. Go figure.
See previous IPBiz posts:
Manuel Pangilinan offers to resign over plagiarism
Ateneo de Manila University does NOT accept Pangilinan resignation
Full post as published by IPBiz on April 26, 2010 (boomark / email).
Explicit E-Mail
Adult website fined $413,000 in explicit e-mail matter.

Thoughts on rankings by software of the complexity or value of matters handled by the law department
Does Grammar Matter for Lawyers, Judges and Law Students
Gray Matter and Dopamine Levels in Fibromyalgia Patients
Ind. Decisions - Supreme Court issues disciplinary opinion re legal advertisements








